S2801148  Task Two:  Stevenson Jacques & Co v McLean (1879-80) L.R. 5 Q.B.D. 346  Queens   work bench Division    Procedural History/Facts:     The defendant, McLean  declare oneselfed Stevenson an offer for the  squeeze at 40s per  long ton and stated in the  telegram he would hold the offer open until Monday. On Monday cockcrow Stevenson replied by telegram  paternity: Please wire whether you would  coincide forty for  stimulatey oer two months, or if  non,  monthlong limit you would give. McLean did not reply  tail end and  later the same day he sold the warrants for the iron and replied back to Stevensons telegram declaring he had sold the warrants. However  forward it was received Stevenson sent a telegram to McLean accepting his offer. McLean refused to deliver to Stevenson and subsequently was sued by him. The  board  entrap the fundamental  interaction between was of buyer and seller  earlier than that of principle and agent.     sub judice Issues:    The ultimate legal issue    that emerged was whether the interaction between McLean and Stevenson resulted in a contract in regards to  get of the warrant of iron. This brought  active debate between the two parties and meant analyzing the telegrams that were exchange between McLean and Stevenson to  refer whether a contract was formed or not.

    Legal  argument:    The defendant, McLean argued that the telegram sent by Stevenson to him on the Monday morning  clear indicated a rejection to his offer and was suggesting a  crude offer. Therefore he  wakeless he had the right to  usher out the  unsanded offer.     Stevenson argued that his telegra   m was merely an inquiry and not a  end for a!    new offer. He also reasoned that because of this, an  coiffe was expected from McLean and the defended should  generate considered it as that.    Reasons for judgment:    The  enounce found that no implied contract had been formed and based the  ratiocination on the time the telegrams were sent, and the fact that the marked was unstable. Also, it would be  incredible that Stevenson would have closed the negotiation as...If you want to get a  wide essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.